THE ESSENCE OF THE TRANSDNIESTRIAN CONFLICT Dr. Aurelian Lavric
IS THE TRANSDNIESTRIAN CONFLICT A CASE OF SEPARATISM?
ARGUMENTS FOR Self-labelling: Moldavian Transdniestrian Republic Inexistence of civil disobedience
ARGUMENTS AGAINST Presence of the Russian Army All leaders of the regime are from Russia Russian financial support of the regime Peace agreement between Russia and Moldova (1992) Russian colonists
THE TRANSDNIESTRIAN CONFLICT IS NOT A CASE OF SEPARATISM BUT A CASE OF FOREIGN INTRUSION
CONSEQUENCES Impossibility of being granted the sovereignty Withdrawal of the Russian Army and paramilitary forces